On the contrary, many fan edits are the products of talented people who creatively reinterpret existing media in the spirit of narrative and aesthetic experimentation.Edit: I should note, that I dont know which is the real topher grace edit. As I argued in a 2014 essay, "Fan Edits and the Legacy of The Phantom Edit," fan edits have frequently been misinterpreted as poorly executed reactionary works made by disgruntled fans. Fan editing practice has evolved much since the controversial reception of Star Wars Episode I.I: The Phantom Edit (2000), which was a seminal fan edit based on George Lucas's Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace (1999). Fan edits take many forms, often to refine or expand a narrative, to shift genres through aesthetic and structural changes, or even to create recombinant story lines using multiple films and television episodes, among other approaches. WhisperEdits presents The Redux Project: a series of fanedits designed to take classic TV episodes and edit them into a more streamlined and cinematic viewing experience.Fan edits are essentially alternative versions of feature films and television shows created by fans using desktop video editing software. Welcome to EverybodyEdits Wiki 15 STAR WARS PREQUEL TRILOGY: THE TOPHER GRACE CUT Possibly the most famous fan edit in history is ironically one that you'll probably never see.
![]() Topher Grace Star Wars Series Of FaneditsHowever, the process of reconstructing fan edits, which typically involves retracing the steps of a previous editor, inevitably leads to creative variations. In response to the demand for inaccessible fan edits, some industrious fans resort to replication as a means of appreciating scarce works. I introduce the term vaporcut in this essay to account for intangible fan edits such as Grace's much-publicized yet unreleased editing projects. More recently, celebrity fan editors like Steven Soderbergh and Topher Grace have attracted a remarkable amount of public interest in fan editing, but they have notably taken steps to limit access to their work, most likely due to legal concerns (Sciretta 2012 Bernard 2014). Original ending of Psycho (1960), including the complete psychiatrist monologue. The original scene from Psycho is provided in video 1.Video 1. But Hitchcock crystallizes this for us merely to force us to reject it" (149). The psychiatrist, glib and complacent, reassures us. In defense of the scene, Wood (2002) argues that the psychiatrist's evaluation "crystallizes for us our tendency to evade the implications of the film, by converting Norman into a mere 'case,' hence something we can easily put from us. Rebuilding and remixing Psycho: The Roger Ebert Cut In a review of Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho (1960) that coincided with the release of Gus Van Sant's nearly shot-for-shot remake version, Roger Ebert (1998) criticizes Hitchcock's use of a psychiatrist character (Simon Oakland), whose monologue near the conclusion of the film diligently explains Norman Bates's (Anthony Perkins) psychosis. Superscript word for macThose edits, I submit, would have made "Psycho" very nearly perfect. And now, the other half has taken over, probably for all time." Then I would cut out everything else the psychiatrist says, and cut to the shots of Norman wrapped in the blanket while his mother's voice speaks ("It's sad when a mother has to speak the words that condemn her own son"). He only half existed to begin with. Two months later, working under his film editor pseudonym, Mary Ann Bernard (2014), Soderbergh posted a reedited version of Michael Cimino's Heaven's Gate (1980), which Soderbergh claimed that he created in 2006. The first was Psychos, a mashup of Psycho (1960) and Psycho (1998). Steven Soderbergh and Heaven's Gate: The Butcher's Cut Since February 2014, Steven Soderbergh has released his own fan edits on his Web site, Extension 765 ( ). Alternative version of the conclusion to Psycho (1960) by Joshua Wille. Because of the lack of access to Stomachworm's fan edit, I reconstructed Ebert's version (video 2).Video 3. In a Twitter post on October 16, 2011, Ebert acknowledged the work, writing, "I'm opposed to piracy but find this fanedit of 'Psycho' proves a point: Hitchcock didn't need the psychiatrist." At that time, Ebert's tweet linked to a torrent that eventually became inactive and, like many torrents exclusively indexed by The Pirate Bay, this link to Psycho: The Roger Ebert Cut was also broken after the December 2014 raid. Screen grab of the disclaimer in Heaven's Gate: The Butcher's Cut by Mary Ann Bernard (Steven Soderbergh), which reads: "I acknowledge that what I have done with this film is both immoral and illegal." Ironically, by attempting to limit the consumption of his fan edit, Soderbergh inspired further transformative work. Contemplating whether Soderbergh's fan edits would fall under the same fair use provisions that CleanFlicks unsuccessfully claimed in its legal defense, Post (2015) asks if Soderbergh "thinks that he has some kind of 'artistic license' to do what he denies to others, that his creativity is somehow more valuable than the creativity of others?" Perhaps in deference to those who might challenge his unauthorized version of Cimino's film, Soderbergh preceded this fan edit with a cheeky disclaimer (figure 2).Figure 2. Soderbergh's fan editing endeavors have been criticized by some as hypocritical because he was a prominent participant in a 2006 lawsuit that consequently shut down CleanFlicks, a company that resold unsanctioned versions of Hollywood films in which depictions of sex, violence, and profanity were edited out (Masnick 2015).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorAnissa ArchivesCategories |